The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
According to a controversial research, reducing the consumption of sausages, prawns, steaks and processed red meat is a waste of time for many people.
According to a controversial research, reducing the consumption of sausages, prawns, steaks and processed red meat is a waste of time for many people.
The report, which many organizations disagree with, states that the evidence is weak and that people's health is less at risk than using these products.
Some experts have even praised this complex research. Other experts, however, say that such 'dangerously misleading' research could 'endanger the public'.
What's included in red meat or processed meat?
Red meat includes cows, sheep, pigs, bulls and deer meat while poultry, ducks
And other birds of prey are not included.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Processed meat is meat that is kept for longer and whose taste changes. It is cooked in smoke, added salt or dried meat.
Price is not included in processed meat. But bacon, hot dog, salty, curd beef, ham and beans are among them.
Are they bad for health?
There is a greater risk of bowel cancer.
When the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer said that processed meat causes cancer, it became the headline of news worldwide.
It also stated that it was' potentially a cause of cancer but there was little evidence.
In the UK alone, every year, 5400 people suffer from bowel cancer and are thought to be due to the use of processed meat.
It has also been suggested that consuming processed meats can lead to heart health and type 2 diabetes.
According to scientific results, excessive consumption of processed meat is very bad for your health.
What does this new controversial research say?
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Experts from Canada's McMaster and Dalhousie University say they have seen the same evidence as others.
These results are hidden in the journal Internal Medicine, which is released on a yearly basis. It says that if a thousand people stop using three quarters of red meat or processed meat in their diet each week, the total number of cancer deaths Seven deaths will be less.
Similarly, in 11 years, heart mortality will decrease by four. In the same way, if by the age of 11 a thousand people reduce their weekly consumption of red meat by three-fourths.
Reducing red meat will reduce the total number of people with type 2 diabetes by six.
Similarly, reduced consumption of processed meat will reduce the risk of type six diabetes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The research reveals the same risks that went before, but the interpretation and interpretation of them are completely different.
Experts say
The risks are not too great The evidence is very weak. They certainly don't say the risks are real.
Associate Professor Bradley Johnston, a researcher involved in the research, told the BBC that it is the right choice for many people to continue to consume meat, but it is not the right choice for everyone.
He said that we do not say, 'There is no danger. We are saying that there is really little evidence of this, its less use reduces cancer and the adverse health effects are less. '
How has this research been conducted?
Statisticians have supported this research method.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Professor Kevin McEwanoy is a professor of Applied Statistics at the Open University.
Professor David Spiegel Halter, who is from Cambridge University, says that studies conducted in careful and impartial research have not yielded good evidence that under-utilization of meat is good for health. Is.'
"Indeed, it did not produce good evidence at all."
Research results?
The same thing happened with this research as the balloon goes down the atmosphere because in many areas there was disagreement on the interpretation of the results of this research.
Health officials in England have told the BBC that they have no plans to review advice on setting limits on meat consumption.
Dr Marco Springman, from Oxford University, says these are dangerously misleading suggestions. They say this is described as undermining scientific evidence, which in any case is a research conducted on very few people who eat meat from economically strong countries.
Dr Gyota Metro, who is affiliated with the World Cancer Research Fund, says this could put people at risk.
Professor Nita Frohi, from Cambridge University, says the research was lacking.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Research suggests that if a thousand people reduce the amount of processed meat three times a week for 10 years, diabetes type two cases will decrease.
She says that under normal circumstances, type 2 diabetes is not trivial in a country's population.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
According to a controversial research, reducing the consumption of sausages, prawns, steaks and processed red meat is a waste of time for many people.
According to a controversial research, reducing the consumption of sausages, prawns, steaks and processed red meat is a waste of time for many people.
The report, which many organizations disagree with, states that the evidence is weak and that people's health is less at risk than using these products.
Some experts have even praised this complex research. Other experts, however, say that such 'dangerously misleading' research could 'endanger the public'.
What's included in red meat or processed meat?
Red meat includes cows, sheep, pigs, bulls and deer meat while poultry, ducks
And other birds of prey are not included.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Processed meat is meat that is kept for longer and whose taste changes. It is cooked in smoke, added salt or dried meat.
Price is not included in processed meat. But bacon, hot dog, salty, curd beef, ham and beans are among them.
Are they bad for health?
There is a greater risk of bowel cancer.
When the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer said that processed meat causes cancer, it became the headline of news worldwide.
It also stated that it was' potentially a cause of cancer but there was little evidence.
In the UK alone, every year, 5400 people suffer from bowel cancer and are thought to be due to the use of processed meat.
It has also been suggested that consuming processed meats can lead to heart health and type 2 diabetes.
According to scientific results, excessive consumption of processed meat is very bad for your health.
What does this new controversial research say?
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Experts from Canada's McMaster and Dalhousie University say they have seen the same evidence as others.
These results are hidden in the journal Internal Medicine, which is released on a yearly basis. It says that if a thousand people stop using three quarters of red meat or processed meat in their diet each week, the total number of cancer deaths Seven deaths will be less.
Similarly, in 11 years, heart mortality will decrease by four. In the same way, if by the age of 11 a thousand people reduce their weekly consumption of red meat by three-fourths.
Reducing red meat will reduce the total number of people with type 2 diabetes by six.
Similarly, reduced consumption of processed meat will reduce the risk of type six diabetes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The research reveals the same risks that went before, but the interpretation and interpretation of them are completely different.
Experts say
The risks are not too great The evidence is very weak. They certainly don't say the risks are real.
Associate Professor Bradley Johnston, a researcher involved in the research, told the BBC that it is the right choice for many people to continue to consume meat, but it is not the right choice for everyone.
He said that we do not say, 'There is no danger. We are saying that there is really little evidence of this, its less use reduces cancer and the adverse health effects are less. '
How has this research been conducted?
Statisticians have supported this research method.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Professor Kevin McEwanoy is a professor of Applied Statistics at the Open University.
Professor David Spiegel Halter, who is from Cambridge University, says that studies conducted in careful and impartial research have not yielded good evidence that under-utilization of meat is good for health. Is.'
"Indeed, it did not produce good evidence at all."
Research results?
The same thing happened with this research as the balloon goes down the atmosphere because in many areas there was disagreement on the interpretation of the results of this research.
Health officials in England have told the BBC that they have no plans to review advice on setting limits on meat consumption.
Dr Marco Springman, from Oxford University, says these are dangerously misleading suggestions. They say this is described as undermining scientific evidence, which in any case is a research conducted on very few people who eat meat from economically strong countries.
Dr Gyota Metro, who is affiliated with the World Cancer Research Fund, says this could put people at risk.
Professor Nita Frohi, from Cambridge University, says the research was lacking.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
Research suggests that if a thousand people reduce the amount of processed meat three times a week for 10 years, diabetes type two cases will decrease.
She says that under normal circumstances, type 2 diabetes is not trivial in a country's population.
The disadvantage is but not so much 'new research on meat-eating
0 Comments